Is The VIP Art Fair Unfair?
// January 25th, 2011 // View Comments // b-scene
B-Uncut is all about innovation in Art and, of course, the Internet. So we love the idea of selling Art online. You would think then, that we would be big fans of The VIP Art Fair? Well, yes and no…
Art is one of those industries that provides debate after debate about where it can go forward and what is acceptable or not. Whether it is denying new forms of Art their right to be classed alongside established genres, or debating what level of mass consumption is right – Art produces as many arguments as it does pieces.
The VIP Art Fair is no different. The concept is brilliant – selling and demonstrating Art online are the next logical steps in spreading Art Worldwide. It isn’t the first online Art innovation. Ideas like our very own B-Uncut and The Future Generation Art Prize have shown themselves to be great ways spreading Arts global reach and giving artists the chance to start earning a name for themselves.
After making a name for themselves, an artist will hopefully be in the position where they can make some money – artists have bills just like anyone else. What can be better then, than something like The VIP Art Fair? It’s a chance for artists to sell their works to collectors that have the money and inclination to pay well for the pieces they like.
There are a number of problems with the concept though – both in terms of its implementation and whether it is the right thing to do. If you were about to spend sums potentially in to the millions for a piece of Art, would you want to buy it from somewhere that doesn’t give you option of seeing it up close and personally? It is far less personal than an auction type situation and is almost like buying ‘blind’. I feel trepidation spending more than £50 on eBay, so I would struggle to part with such huge sums on Art, with just a few pictures as a reference point.
Everyone is different though. I do believe that there is a market for spending big on online Art, particularly with the younger generation of Internet users. With The VIP Art Fair taking in a dream list of top galleries and artists work, they will have no trouble selling the pieces. In fact, the work of featured artists like Jackson Pollock, Louise Bourgeois, Francis Bacon and Damien Hirst practically sells itself.
The only problem I have is with the fact buyers are ‘invite only’. Sure, I’m a little short of £1 million for a Jackson Pollock piece, but the fact remains, if you only allow a certain crowd of Art buyers to take part, you are making Art elitist. Elitism is not something Art needs thrown at it, being that it is already battling against this public perception already. I don’t think it is doing a particularly good job of battling either.
Closing off the potential for everyone to enjoy and purchase top Art works is creating a ‘closed shop’ vibe around the Modern Art World. I can’t afford to buy top Art, but I would like to think that I could if I had the money. I think it is unfair to prevent potential buyers that right, that is why I think things like The Future Generation Art Prize are a much better and more meaningful step for Art as a whole.
So, it’s sadly a case of: The VIP Art Fair – almost very good, but not quite…
What do you think? Let us know…










