Posts Tagged ‘Tate Modern’

Gerhard Richter loves Blur

// November 14th, 2011 // View Comments // b-inspired, featured

Painting blur, that is. The epic retrospective of his work at the Tate Modern features Richter’s lifelong love affair with paint, and affinity for its manipulation. Even as Tacita Dean mourns the loss of film, Richter laughs in the face of those who proclaim paint a dead medium. He’s done a lot of interesting politically motivated work on subjects like the Baader-Meinhof group and Germany’s Nazi past. But for me, at least, the variety of his painterly tricks was the best part.

Consider this stunner, Negroes. Richter projected a found photograph of a Sudanese tribe onto canvas in order to perfectly replicate it. He then dragged a dry brush across the wet paint to create a blurred effect, one of his stylistic signatures. Paradoxically, the blur suggests hyper-realistic movement while simultaneously emphasizing the physical nature of paint.

Richter’s very well known for abstract works like this, Abstract Painting. He uses a squeegee to push the paint around the canvas and revealing hidden layers of paint. It’s easy to take a look at this paltry reproduction and proclaim “bah! I could do that.” But when you behold it in its full glory it’s surprisingly affecting. Richter masterfully plays with scale and layering here, so you can’t tell which layers are on top and which are peeking out. You can only create this kind of image using paint, and Richter reminds us that it’s a living, breathing medium.

In Lilies Richter quite literally takes a swipe at cliché. Flowers are a centuries-old symbol of mortality and decay, particularly the traditionally funereal lily. Richter originally painted the flowers with photorealistic precision, but found the resulting image “unbearable,” and blurred it into ghostliness. As a result, the lilies are a more effective memento mori.

A surreal, claustrophobic Seascape. Richter cut the sky out of two photos of the sea before turning one upside down and pasting it above the other. He then painted the photographs in the familiar blurry/crisp style. This is a good example of his contemporary engagements with Europe’s great painting traditions. Seascapes are traditional material for painters, but Richter introduces the more recent technique of collage. Interestingly, although this work dates from 1970, it reminds us of today’s Photoshopped images.

Many reviewers have marvelled at Richter’s range. This small-scale intimate portrait of his wife forms a strong contrast to the big abstract canvases. Reader is a tribute to Vermeer’s iconic painting. Richter depicts light like the Dutch genius but brings the subject into the 20th century by showing her reading a news magazine rather than an enigmatic letter.

I’d love to talk about all the exciting paintings in the exhibition, but we’d be here all day. Go see it, if you can. And if you want a squeegeed abstract piece, brief the Exchange.

Miró retrospective is hit or miss…depends if you like blue

// May 9th, 2011 // View Comments // Uncategorized, b-Crowd, b-inspired, featured

Joan Miró's Blue I, II, III, 1961, Centre Pompidou, Paris © Successió Miró/ADAGP, Paris and DACS, London 2011. Photograph: Andrew Dunkley/Tate Photography

The first major retrospective of Joan Miró’s work in over 50 years finally comes to the Tate Modern in London, but it may not be worth the visit.

Joan Miró was a one of the influential members of the Surrealist movement and was famous for his adoption of rich colours and his fiercely patriotic depictions of his Catalonia homeland.

Each of the 12 rooms – containing over 150 paintings, drawings, sculptures and prints –  is dedicated to a major creative era in the artist’s career.  The exhibition takes the viewer on a journey beginning with his early works emphasising his Catalan identity, through his influences from the Surrealists and ending with his admiration of American Abstract Expressionism.

However, the exhibition is just too much to take in all at once.  Each room is completely different and contains an overwhelming amount of Miró’s work.  The vast display of pieces from different decades and creative eras of the artist’s life creates distraction and disunity, rather than the feeling of a cohesive display.

The exhibition traces Miró’s dedication to the political and cultural shifts in his surroundings and how his work is a response to the turbulence in 20th century Europe.  The influences of his Catalan identity, the Spanish Civil War and the rise and fall of Franco’s regime come through in his paintings, drawings and sculptures.  Even the simplest of pieces, especially during his adoption of Surrealism, reflects the political and cultural climate.  However, his playful use of colour and symbolism is more light hearted than despondent.  A bird, which represents a bomber plane on Miró’s canvases, inspires a more cheerful reaction rather than illustrating the grim reality of wartime.

Some of his more famous works on display, The Escape Ladder (1940) or Constellation: Awakening in the Early Morning (1941), are shockingly disappointing in real life.  The colours don’t seem as vibrant and the detail doesn’t seem as intricate as expected.

However, there is one room at the exhibition that makes the entire collection worth the hype: the famous triptych, Blue I-II-III (1961).  The paintings, each measuring over 10 metres in length, are a vibrant blue that fully envelops the viewer.  A special octagonal room was created for these Abstract Expressionist pieces to be seen together.  From the centre of the room, the paintings fully surround the viewer and block out the rest of the exhibition.

If you love blue, then the octagonal room merits a visit, but the rest of the exhibition may be a miss.  However, you may have to wait another 50 years to see a Miró retrospective on this scale.

Miró once famously exclaimed that he wanted to “assassinate painting”, and with this exhibition, he seems to have achieved this goal.

Christmas Tree, Oh…..Tree

// December 10th, 2010 // View Comments // Uncategorized

Would you like a top artist to decorate your Christmas tree this year?

Every year Tate Britain invites a prominent artist to do just that. This year it was the turn of Giorgio Sadotti. The Manchester born artist called his festive endeavour ‘Flower Snake’.

You’re probably wondering how it looks. That’s the really interesting bit. The giant Norwegian Spruce is totally naked apart from a coiled bullwhip and a circle of silver postcards around its base.  The whip will be used during a ceremony on Twelfth Night when the spirit of Christmas will be driven out of the London gallery.

Did Giorgio misplace his baubles you wonder? Did he run out of tinsel decorating his own tree?

Apparently not:

“For me, the challenge was to present a tree that was naturally effortless,” Sadotti said. ”A tree that managed to maintain its dignity and timeless grace. A tree that remained sublime. A tree that was familiar but strange, like all trees but like no other. A tree that had potential to become another. A tree that talked. A tree as a tree as art.”

He certainly kept me guessing.

Reading further into it, part of the mystery may be easily accounted for. Giorgio admitted his bare tree may have been “a weird kind of reaction” to his previous job, wait for it,  as a professional corporate Christmas tree decorator in New York!

“We used to come in with our kit and decorations and do the tree, and at the end of the day everyone in the offices would come down and stand in a circle around the tree and applaud our magnificent effort,” he said.

I bet he wasn’t short of a bauble or some tinsel back then……

What do you think? Festive or a bit bah humbug?

Seeds Of Doubt Over Safety At Tate Modern Exhibition

// October 22nd, 2010 // View Comments // b-inspired

2010 - the year when dust received more publicity than ever before.

First came the Icelandic Volcano ash which covered the world and caused chaos to the travel industry back in March. Now harmful ceramic dust has formed a barrier between the long waited ‘Sunflower Seeds’ installation from Ai Weiwei and its audience.

The installation aims to bring an interactive art experience to Tate Modern visitors.

The barrier poses a question- which side does western democracy support? Rather than looking for solutions that could help eliminate the health risks (whilst maintaining at least minimum interactivity)- the audience has been left with a grey carpet of seeds metres away from them. Will the decision to build a barrier at the Tate Modern satisfy authorities in China who have always protested against the country’s most prominent artist’s ideas of individuality?

A barrier in this case is the easiest but hardly the most effective way of solving the problem. It presents an unwillingness to experience the idea of suppression of individual power.  To some extent, it is devaluation of an art that was hand-crafted for two years by hundreds of people in order to provide lifetime experience? Sweeping a narrow path in the middle of a seed carpet and providing audiences and Tate staff with dust resistant masks could have brought Tate visitors closer to Ai’s interpretation of a post-modern society.

‘Sunflower Seeds’ – is an artwork made out of ceramic pieces that amount to almost twice the number of  the UK’s population.  The capacity of installation and power of  the artist’s idea can only be experienced by getting a few seeds into your palm and recognising that every single one of them is unique.

Souvenirs for Sale

// May 21st, 2010 // View Comments // b-scene

The Tate Modern’s 10 year anniversary was an opulent festival of international independents hosted like a worldwide flea market in the Turbine Hall. There were all sorts of wild and engaging artworks, installations and performances operating closely together like a mutated art organism. ‘No Soul For Sale’ ended up a-too-good-to-be-true title as many of the artists we talked with had to finance the whole trip themselves. This debt slavery cemented their vocation to focus efforts, resources and exhibiting space to selling. Artists aren’t the best money hustlers and there was a whole host of plausible and implausible bric a brac! Watch the video to get some more flavour.

Independent arts organisations taking part in No Soul For Sale include: Alternative Space LOOP (Seoul), Arrow Factory (Beijing), Arthub Asia (Shanghai/Bangkok/Beijing), Artis – Contemporary Israeli Art Fund (New York / Tel Aviv), Artspeak (Vancouver), Artists Space (New York), Auto Italia (London), Ballroom (Marfa), Black Dogs (Leeds), Barbur (Jerusalem), Capacete Entertainment (Rio de Janeiro), Casas Tres Patios (Medellín), Centre Cinématèque de Tanger (Tangier), Cinema Project (Portland), cneai= (Paris-Chatou), Collective Parasol (Kyoto), Dispatch (New York), e-flux (Berlin), Elodie Royer and Yoann Gourmel – 220 jours (Paris), Embassy (Edinburgh), Exyzt & Coloco (Paris), Filipa Oliveira + Miguel Amado (Lisbon), FLUXspace (Philadelphia), FormContent (London), Galerie im Regierungsviertel/Forgotten Bar Project (Berlin), Green Papaya Art Projects (Manila), Hell Gallery (Melbourne), Hermes und der Pfau (Stuttgart), i-cabin (London), Intoart (London), K48 Kontinuum (New York), Kling & Bang (Reykjavík), L’appartement 22 (Rabat), Latitudes (Barcelona), Le Commissariat (Paris), Le Dictateur (Milan), Light Industry (New York), Lucie Fontaine (Milan), lugar a dudas (Cali), Machine Project (Los Angeles), Mousse (Milan), Museum of Everything (London), Next Visit (Berlin), New Jerseyy (Basel), Not An Alternative (New York), no.w.here (London), Oregon Painting Society (Portland), Or Gallery (Vancouver), P-10/Post Museum (Singapore), Para/Site Art Space (Hong Kong), Peep-Hole (Milan), PiST (Istanbul), PSL [Project Space Leeds] (Leeds), Rhizome (New York), Salamanca (Jerusalem), San Art (Ho Chi Minh City), Studio 1.1 (Liverpool), Suburban (Chicago), Swiss Institute (New York), The Mountain School of Arts (Los Angeles), The Royal Standard (Liverpool), Thisisnotashop (Dublin), Torpedo – supported by the Office for Contemporary Art Norway (Oslo), Tranzit (Prague), Viafarini DOCVA (Milan), Vox Populi (Philadelphia), Western Bridge (Seattle), Western Front Society (Vancouver), White Columns (New York), Y3K (Melbourne), 2nd Cannons Publications (Los Angeles), and 98 Weeks (Beirut).

Chris Ofili: Shock, And Then Not.

// February 10th, 2010 // View Comments // b-scene

.

Upon entering Tate Britain for the Chris Ofili retrospective, viewers are warned of the “offensive” imagery on view. Anyone familiar with the artist is accustomed to seeing the glitzy, brilliant, and intense paintings he is best known for: Ofili’s use of elephant dung, artfully placed on parts of his paintings and used constantly to prop the works up from the ground, as well as his constant inclusion of imagery from pornography magazines, are what made this British artist notorious. To the artist, however, the materials and intense colours used in the early paintings are not simply used for decoration but resonate with Ofili’s personal history, Nigerian voo doo, the lyrics of rap artists and the sociological concerns of black people today. Ofili’s new work continues to speak to the same themes but the paintings have lost their glittering flamboyance.

Ofili’s paintings are sparsely propped against the four white walls of brightly lit rooms and Tate’s space suddenly feels like a commercial gallery. His early paintings smother the viewer immediately;  they are immensely confrontational and challenging both from a distance and even more so on close inspection. But the true treasure of the exhibition is found after the early works; a dark walnut-panelled chamber has been built exclusively by David Adjaye to house Ofili’s “Upper Room” series that has just been purchased by the museum. The room acts as a site of contemplation, a religious chapel. Its title refers to the room where the Last Supper was held. Here viewers quietly absorb thirteen paintings of monkeys. The paintings are individualized by colour and the colours extend off the borders of the canvas and radiate against the dark walls underneath their individual lights.

Finally, as the viewer emerges from this enclosed space, they are left with Ofili’s newest works. Clearly, something has changed. The paint is a deeper range of colours, the works are unadorned, and references to sex, religion and pornography are inconspicuous. After the heightened sensations of the previous galleries, these unremarkable paintings are quite honestly a let down. Perhaps seen in their own light, without the heightened expectations triggered by his previous work one’s reaction to the paintings would be more positive. The majority of art critic reaction has been less then charitable; for example Charlotte Higgins posted on the Guardian “the moment I walked into the final room of the show my heart, I have to confess, sank”.  In a way I suppose one has to decide if his work was more then glitter and elephant dung. Is the artist relevant without the shock.

Living in a ma-ma-material world

// October 30th, 2009 // View Comments // b-scene

The Tate Modern’s exhibitions never disappoint and their latest Pop Life: Art in a Material World exhibition has le “va va voom”!

It’s a fun and colourful trip through pop art’s greatest hits from Andy Warhol to Richard Prince to Jeff Koons to Damien Hirst. For a moment we felt like pulling some of our best break-dance moves on the dance floor. Pop Life takes us through a journey of decadence where media-obsessed celebs flashed their dollars to the world whilst indulging in a sinful life of sex, drugs and rock n’ roll.

As superficially fun and sensational as this exhibition may seem, the fact remains that the Tate deals with one of the most controversial issues of contemporary art — what happens to art when it embraces the mass market, capitalism and money? — taking Warhol’s maxim as its point of departure, “Good business is the best art”.

The show starts well with a highlight of Warhol’s cynical late works including a number of works from his initially controversial series known as the Retrospectives or Reversals. Including a number of celebrity portraits he made of anyone for a set price; the screenprints of gems that glitter cheesily with diamond dust; and his classic guest appearance with his Polaroid camera in an episode of The Love Boat.

It then takes us to giggly moments — like Japanese pop artist Takashi Murakami’s pop video of Kirsten Dunst singing the old Eighties hit Turning Japanese, surrounded by cute Japanese girls. Followed by more “dramatic” moments of do-not-miss art from artists such as Piotr Uklanski’s grid of stills of Hollywood actors playing Nazis.

Finally, just as we think we might have got Pop Art’s drift about art, mass and cash, a series of rooms dedicated to porn and drugs caught our “attention”. Two questions crossed our minds: how provocative can porn be in this context and what are those bouncers here for?!